![]() I appreciated this "belt and suspenders" approach, as it shows that Sadlak is not only familiar with this mount style's malady but also did something to remedy it. Every attachment and leveling screw involved has a set screw keeping it in place, a technique that most modern firearms mounts don't even employ. of cant to the base for those looking to reach out. This leveling option allows the installer to add up to 60 m.o.a. Lastly, the scope is leveled and snugged by adjustment screws both fore and aft, which are held in place by the included thread locker and their respective set screws. I found that my 1945-made Springfield Armory M1 accommodated one on each side rather tightly to the point of requiring gentle tapping to set in place. Sadlak includes a set of brass shims to take up any space between the ears and the mount. The main mounting screws use these holes in conjunction with the pocket's geometry to hold the mount in place, the same way a modern Picatinny rail hugs a receiver's contour to keep it from shifting. The process starts by removing the entire rear sight assembly, leaving you with a pocket and a pair of ears to run mounting hardware through. By installing the Sadlak M1 mount, we can forgo the sights altogether and put a modern optic on the Garand without any permanent alteration. Rear apertures also wiggle far outside my comfort zone, and getting them to hold still might involve replacing an original part, a major no-go in my book. As the front sight's stability depends on its fit to the barrel's splines, I've seen rotational instability far exceeding the rifle's accuracy potential. The culprit is typically some variety of sight jiggle. Many M1 Garand rifles suffer from poor accuracy, despite having pristine barrels and chambers. However, some folks do indeed get it, and here are three that I found work well. Nonetheless, sometimes the old warhorses benefit from the addition of glass, if only but for a short period.Īlthough there are many non-permanent mounting systems for the most common rifles, I have found that most are nothing more than mere gimmicks, don't fit or are some sad combination of the two. It seems nothing gets it worse than military surplus rifles, mainly because they lack basic provisions to get the job done and invite improvisation. If you spend enough time at gun shows and public shooting ranges, you've likely run into your fair share of scope-mounting abominations. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |